|Date Added:||20 March 2017|
|File Size:||21.38 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
So which side has the superior technology? After all, there’s the general impression that having a discrete graphics card is better than integrated graphics. Despite starting from the same concept, both graphics chipmakers have quite different implementations. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. Please visit HWZ for the latest reviews and news.
While the operating algorithm is simple, memory swapping occurs more often.
Things are slightly different now due to the wider and faster PCIe interface that has equal upstream and downstream bandwidth and that has convinced chipmakers to give it another shot. Instead, we shall be focusing on a low budget graphics card retail solution based on ATI’s HyperMemory technology, the Sapphire Radeon X SE and see how it performs against other budget cards.
Hence, there would not be an in-depth analysis and comparison of the two technologies, though you may still find the results relevant enough to form your own conclusions from them.
They were nearly identical to the chips used in Radeon andonly differing in that they were native PCI Express offerings. As expected, we have two competing technologies from the present graphics duopoly.
ATi Radeon R Series. This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Radeon R Radeon R ATI Technologies products Video cards.
Having really low budget cards will almost certainly attract mainstream consumers, especially when it comes ‘branded’ with the ATI or NVIDIA logo, unlike the generic integrated graphics solution and besides, some of those implementations have their drawbacks.
Retrieved from ” https: Views Read Edit View history.
ATI Radeon X SE HyperMemory Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database
Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. Please help improve this article if you can. Retrieved 23 March This page was last edited on 15 Julyat Even if most implementations of the interface have yet to achieve the theoretical limits, the results are encouraging and bode well for future, more bandwidth intensive tasks like HD video streaming where GPUs can play a useful role.
While this was initially mooted and implemented with AGP cards, the limitations of the technology then meant that it was an idea ahead of its time, as the results were not impressive.
PowerColor Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory 128 MB Review
Retrieved 7 December Current technologies and software. See article rradeon R’s pixel shaders. Compared to the older AGP standard, the greater bandwidth and higher transfer rates of PCIe are some of the more obvious advantages. Support in this table refers to the most current version. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This article has multiple issues. We shall not be answering that question directly as that is not our focus in this review. October Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Sapphire RADEON X300 SE HyperMemory graphics card – Radeon X300 SE – 32 MB
Meanwhile, ATI has gone purely software, depending on memory management algorithms, which they have named HyperMemory. This is an old archive page of HWZ prior to revamp. This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.
A compatible HDCP display is also needed for this.